And you believe the games of games?

And you believe the games of games? For example, the Witcher 3, the most anticipated and best role -playing game of the latter as I am 4 years old, on Game Informer – 91. The last part of the once great Call of Duty series is 84. I believe that the scan, by which such games are very small, of course, the fact that I disagree with the opinion of the Matra industry of the reviewers and the rules that they are guided, are deceiving us, trying to be objective, or please others. But I will not make the most stupid and major mistake in my life, saying that all reviews are a mistake of nature, and they have no place in this universe, because how many reviews are how many opinions, and in fact they all have the right to exist.

However, we all know the price – points, and what they mean. Between 70-79%, this score serves as the basis that the game costs your attention, that it is not bad to play, but has a number of problems that annoy, or what kind of gameplay deficiencies, not critical, you can play, but I would like better.

Assessment between 80-89%that the game is recommended for the game, and have only some small jambs that are not directly related to the game, but with the expectation of the players that they expected from it and they were justified. Ultimately, it is precisely such games that become candidates for the game of the year.

Meanwhile, traditional 80-89 % mean that the game should be checked, and anything that is higher than this was immediately announced as the game of a candidate of the year.

90 – 100%. This is a brilliant game, 11/10. MUST https://rolletto-casino.co.uk/ HAVE. Shut Up and Take My Money. Approved, recommended for use in any licensed form.

But everything that turns out outside these numbers is considered garbage that there is nothing worthwhile, a pale likeness for real games, you can simply skip and you will not lose anything. Here is the whole problem. We must not forget that the opinion is subjective, that for one 2 for the other at least 6.

Before the perfect game, there are not enough “points”, and rarely, who can say why, that she did not have enough in detail, and not in 2 words. Despite the fact that some “reviewers” ​​examine the game through the “prism of one sign, and cling to it to reduce the assessment, but do not want to consider many signs, make out on the shelves, why this game is not worth their attention, or try, give people, why will they want to play this game. It is 70% easier to find the words of the accusation, mix with mud, water shit, say one word without justifying, and consider it a review than to try to find in this game, something beautiful. And do not focus on one that makes her bad.

The essence is that we do not even use this scale in full. One and the same school for different games. Why use it, so that there is more run for evaluation or to understand the greatness of our thoughts criticism?

Some may assume that the rating does not particularly affect the choice of the game. And the player rating affects? They do not depend on others when choosing a game, and it is on them that you can focus on them, but they are biased, and critics are independent, this is a rating of one person. But how are the reviews paid? In any case it will be noticeable whether you paid or not, when you play the game yourself. The critic is a small personality cult that says what to play and what is not. We follow the leader, we believe in his words, reading listening to his reviews, many will take everything for a pure coin. And his assessments, like a balm on the soul. Everything seems to be fine, but others are different when you start playing. Despite the fact that his publication may be far away, from the truth, and falsity will be clearly visible, someone trying to impose his opinion on you, will reduce the very value of this game, and the review. And you will consider it your opinion.

There is even the reason that the reviews do not sing, the same melody. The song is about the same thing, but the words are different, but they give assessments, someone more, someone less. And everyone looks at them, they see that the leading “reviews” have not been very dispersed. Why do we first look at the rating, in 1: is it worth the game to play it, or even read more about it. And in 2: laziness. After all, the numbers will tell you faster what kind of game it is than reading.

However, a minor scatter of ratings can let gamers think why this is happening, because he heard that this game is not loved, and the rating is high, or vice versa.

Everything indicates that this review system is overflowing. In the plan that too many games are located nearby, all just 0.1. Score. Moreover, they have a place in a different corner. We live in the Golden Age of the video game, where the quality of the game surpasses all our expectations … Well, here again, but what about Dawngredi, Bagi, Failes, Bad Port.
Well, okay, the quality does not always prevail over the rating.

There is no simple way to change this. It is impossible to make everything to sing in unison, put the same points, introduce one assessment system. But, in the end, I want to say that what rating is essentially not important. The main thing is that you have a head on your shoulders, you can understand what to play and what you can miss. And at the end of the day, at the end of the review, the credits, the most important thing, are your emotions, and not soulless numbers. And not to be angry that some critic, put the game not a well-deserved rating. This is what matters.